With the US government’s on-going campaign to make the
global financial business more ethical and socially responsible, was the French
banking giant PNB Paribas unfairly targeted?
By: Ringo Bones
The very “punitive” fine of 8.9 billion US dollars to be
paid by the Paris based French banking giant BNP Paribas for dealing with
countries and entities blacklisted by the US government seem to be over-the-top
when it comes to punitive fines recently paid by financial institutions who
either never disclosed the full extent of the risk of their iffy financial
instruments they are peddling or their dealings with business and/or government
entities blacklisted by the US government. And also, BNP Paribas’ license /
permit to trade in US dollars is also suspended. But is the almost 9 billion US
dollar fine of BNP Paribas rather excessive and make one think that BNP Paribas
is unfairly targeted by US financial authorities?
In monetary terms, 8.9 billion US dollars is about four
times the annual profit of BNP Paribas and the very amount – according to
financial pundits – seems very excessive when it comes to fines for violating
sanctions that are not mutually ratified between the US Congress and the French
government. Although in the eyes of every citizen closely following news events
since the September 11, 2001 Terror Attacks, BNP Paribas dealing with US
government blacklisted entities like Iran and Sudanese strongman Omar al Bashir
– especially during the time of the Darfur Region Genocide – an 8.9 billion US
dollar fine seems justifiable for such a morally reprehensible act by a large
global financial institution.
But justifiable as the 8.9 billion US dollar fine may be,
financial pundits are concerned over America’s “dollar power” –i.e. the US
dollar being the world’s de facto universal currency since the end of World War
II and the US government's sole ability to choose or deny whatever country can trade it. Often termed as America’s strategic weapon that’s more powerful than the
country’s thermonuclear weapons arsenal, America’s “dollar power” – the US
government’s ability to chose and suspend which government is able to trade in
US dollar funds - is widely criticized due to the fact that it is prone to
abuse and has almost nonexistent appeals process that has been recently
exploited by “vulture fund” managers.
1 comment:
In a recent BBC report, leading financial institutions - like HSBC - has just became "risk averse" by no longer offering risky financial instruments and investments despite of their high potential for high rate of returns in investment for a given period of time. Will the French investment banking giant BNP Paribas follow suit?
Post a Comment