Even though then UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher managed
to (more or less) solve Britain’s economic problems during her tenure, can
Thatcherism be used to solve today’s pressing economic problems?
By: Ringo Bones
Even though then UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher is
still loathed by scores of Britons who had experienced first hand her
privatization of previously nationally-owned utilities that virtually subjected
most of Britain’s working middle class to abject poverty for much of the 1980s,
there is a growing consensus among today’s leading economists that
“Thatcherism” – also known as “Thatcherite Economics” - saved Britain’s then
languishing economy by restructuring it from a virtual socialist type system to
a free market system modeled after the U.S. economy. Economic rigmarole aside,
can Thatcherism be used to solve today’s pressing economic problems currently
plaguing the U.K. and the rest of the E.U.?
Sadly, many leading economists these days seem to have
reached a consensus that Then UK Prime Minister Thatcher’s economic policies
that restructured Britain’s economy to a more free market driven one – and made
scores of investors and hedge fund managers rich - during the 1980s were
specifically designed to solve economic problems that the British economy
incurred during the 1970s. For the benefit of everyone too young to have
experienced first hand the economic landscape of the 1970s, here’s a brief
“layout of the land” of what existed back then and why "Thatcherite Economics" manage to fix such intransigent economic debacle born out of the geopolitical turmoil for much of the 1970s.
To the uninitiated, the 1970s are more than just “bad Disco
music” bad clothes and high income and capital gains taxes, the 1970s were also
notorious for the OPEC induced “oil price shocks”, rising wages for specialists
jobs and labor unions drunk with power. Despite earning a relatively
comfortable wage, Brits were paying an annual income tax 89 per cent higher
compared to current rates. UK capital gains tax were also around 89 per cent
higher back in the 1970s compared to current rates. Thus Thatcherism – with its
“non-Keynesian” way of reducing both income and capital gains tax and
drastically reducing budgets for public services – i.e. Reaganomics style
“small government” – virtually allowed the UK economy to benefit from the go-go
greed driven market economy of 1980s America.
Unfortunately, Thatcherism would be woefully ineffective in
solving our current global economic sluggishness because problems that caused
them today are radically different in comparison that caused the economic
sluggishness of the 1970s. Today, the emerging economics – i.e. BRICS nations
as in Brazil, Russia, India, Mainland China and South Africa sometimes referred
to as emerging economies – had been producing more highly educated college
graduates during the past few years that they are the primary driving force
behind the outsourcing phenomena. Why hire an American when a job can be done
online by a college graduate in India for one-fifth of the cost? American jobs
being outsourced to low-wage countries only started near the very tail end of
both Reagan’s and Thatcher’s tenures.
Thatcher style austerity measures would spell disaster today
and even a watered-down version of it is being used currently to solve the British
government’s ballooning budget deficit is causing a gradual – and eventually
disastrous – economic slowdown on the British economy. Better resort to
Keynesian Economics style quantitative easing at the risk of increased
inflation rather than risk a disastrous double-dip recession.
2 comments:
Isn't Thatcherism / Thatcherite Economics nothing more than a British version of Reaganomics - i.e. runaway greed driven capitalism?
Given that then US President Ronald Reagan and then UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher were such cozy anti Soviet Cold War era allies, it could be, Marie Lynne.
Post a Comment