Despite being a traditionally viewed as a relatively safe investment for institutional investors, is the recent credit rating downgrade of Hong Kong by Moody’s unprecedented?
By: Ringo Bones
Back in Marsh 12, 2016, the credit rating agency Moody’s
downgraded Hong Kong’s credit crating to Aa1 and changed the outlook to
negative from stable. Even after the July 1, 1997 handover back to China, Hong
Kong has always been seen as a traditionally stable investment haven for
institutional investors but the recent rationale for assigning a negative
outlook by Moody’s is largely due to the increasing political risks of the
hard-to-maintain policy of one country two systems as in “political linkages with
China risk weighing on Hong Kong’s institutional strength.
With the universal suffrage protests back in 2014 that
virtually brought Hong Kong to a standstill to the recent “detainment” of
bookstore proprietors who stock books who are critical with the Chinese
communist party, it seems that China’s curbing of the political freedoms
previously enjoyed by Hong Kong even after the 1997 handover from Britain are
seen by many institutional investors around the world as a clear and present
political risk that could affect the long-term economic outlook of Hong Kong
despite enjoying a special administrative status.
And given the recent economic slowdown of Mainland China
many institutional investors see the economic and financial linkages of Hong
Kong with the Mainland turn from positive to negative spillovers. Overall,
Moody’s assessment is that banking-sector risk for Hong Kong’s government has
increased. Although to most institutional investors who are worried about the
declining freedoms in Hong Kong, Mainland China’s inability to maintain the one
country two system policy of its special administrative cash cow of a region
sends a big impression that it is the reason for the recent investment ratings
downgrade.
No comments:
Post a Comment